Archive | Reading RSS feed for this section

Tipping My Hat to Zoo With Roy

7 Oct

This may be the most eloquent, poignant piece I’ve read about Roy Halladay’s no hitter anywhere. You’re a class act, ZWR,you magnificent donkey.

My take? What’s left to be said? He was exactly who we expected him to be all season long. He put the team on his back during the regular season and he doesn’t want to stop there.

I will add this: the love that Roy Halladay and Carlos Ruiz share is a truly beautiful thing for the game of baseball. The elation they feel when they accomplish something spectacular is infectious. Is there anything more fun than seeing Chooch’s ear-to-ear grin?

My Problem with RSS

14 Sep

I found myself shaking my head in agreement quite often with this Techcrunch post about the “death of RSS.”

If RSS doesn’t make it, I’ll lay the blame at Google’s digital feet. They came so close to so many good, platform-worthy ideas with Google Reader. Shared items with comments? Tumblr, right? Yeah, that’s what I thought, too. I’ve felt all along that Google just has no idea how to make their products social. You can’t even plug Google Reader into Tumblr and get it to render properly. I went from sharing and commenting on things in my reader to barely bothering to favorite anything in the last year or so.

RSS may have its shortcomings, but it’s far more efficient for someone like me who’s constantly reading the web. It offers better organization than either Twitter or Facebook. It makes it easier to evaluate the value of the information presented. I don’t need to click through to read anything on most blogs, which is a tremendous help. Sure, that doesn’t help the publishers and content creators hit their goals, but if you’re creating good content, people will engage it. RSS, for my money, is still the best way to deliver it to an audience that’s consuming the most content.

I’d be sad to see it go. It’s difficult enough to discover reliable sources as it stands now. If you watch Rick Sanchez I think you’ll agree that Facebook and Twitter aren’t improving the way we consume news by any stretch.

The Return of Rockism?

3 Sep

YouTube Preview Image

Pitchfork may have done a good job of including dance music in their top 200 tracks of the 1990s, but a certain someone was conspicuously absent. Have you ever heard of a recording artist named Garth Brooks? How about Shania Twain? Must I even mention Britney Spears?

I really loved their picks, but they struck me as the return of rockism. I feel that the “r” word, like Voldemort, has been whispered in certain circles in the past year or so about Pitchfork. This list confirmed that suspicion for me. Is it wrong to like popular music again? Should we just pretend that we could always live in an indie bubble and never be concerned with the likes of, say, Sugar Ray?

What I’d love to see Pitchfork come back and do next week is reveal their staff lists, or give us a best of the rest. As I wrote last night, the ’90s in retrospect were a wonderfully eclectic decade. Garth Brooks, gangsta rap, Guns N’ Roses, and grunge? Yes, please! I know it’s difficult to be perfectly inclusive, but you might think it’d be acceptable to at least genuflect to some of the best-selling artists of that decade.

As someone who went to a junior high and high school dances in the ’90s, it’s hard to imagine anyone omitting this gem.

YouTube Preview Image

Pitchfork’s Top 200 Tracks of the 1990s

2 Sep

I’d been waiting to write how awestruck I’ve been by this, but I can’t contain myself any longer. This list has been facemeltingly perfect, at least from the perspective of anyone who’s been reading Pitchfork since the days of dial-up. I can hardly be bothered with the snooty critic’s picks, but what fascinates me are the entries for the corporate rock entities that defined a generation who thought they were rebelling against corporate entities.

Favorites of the moment include the entry for Oasis’ “Live Forever” and the Verve’s “Bittersweet Symphony,” to say nothing of New Order’s “Regret,” the song that introduced me to their entire catalogue. Those opening strains still stop me in my tracks.

Am I a little bummed no one has out and out shocked the readership by including the Verve Pipe? Am I amazed that neither Live nor Dave Matthews Band have made an appearance? Which U2 song will make the list? I hope they pick something from Zooropa. The ’90s weren’t perfect and neither were we. I hope they acknowledge that somehow.

Gil Scott-Heron in the New Yorker

18 Aug

YouTube Preview Image

Recently read Gil Scott-Heron’s profile in the New Yorker and was absolutely gutted. I’m among the few critics who didn’t immediately fall in love with his new album on Matador, and the article did little to convince me that it’s not the most exploitative release of 2010. Can’t help but feel awful for a guy who’s life is completely dictated to him by crack addiction. It’s like taking advantage of old bluesmen if you ask me.

Watch the video for “I’m New Here” above.