That was just a dream, just a dream, just a dream, dream.

Going up?

Lis­ten: Dev­as­ta­tions — I Don’t Want to Lose You Tonight

The scene: Tele­visión Educa­ti­va. The place: some­where with­in Stephane Miroux’s dream scape, which bears an uncan­ny like­ness to any morn­ing info­tain­ment pro­gram set, replete with musi­cal accom­pa­ni­ment a la Laugh-In, a kitchen island for con­coct­ing potions and demon­stra­tion props galore. This is where Stephane nar­rates his own dream, recount­ing a sto­ry about his late father and he enjoy­ing a Duke Elling­ton con­cert. It’s at once mag­i­cal and far­ci­cal, yet poignant, so fresh is the mem­o­ry of his father. Once again, direc­tor Michel Gondry treats us to his rare com­bi­na­tion of mind/body gyra­tions, as well as the entan­gle­ments of history/memory, with more than a lit­tle sen­ti­men­tal­i­ty mixed in for good measure.

But is Home­r’s Odyssey the only sto­ry where you actu­al­ly can go home again, and tri­umphant­ly, no less? When Stephane returns home to be near his wid­owed moth­er, his Dis­as­terolo­gie art­work tucked under his arm, he’s imme­di­ate­ly out of sorts and out of a job, just an unwill­ing patri­arch in an unfa­mil­iar place. To wors­en mat­ters, night­mare log­ic per­vades his whole life; often­times his momen­tary hap­pi­ness­es are can­celed by his hyper­bol­i­cal­ly com­ic regrets. The Sci­ence of Sleep unrav­els like a skein of yarn that encum­bers Stephane and his alter-egos/friends, who share in his tragi-comedy.

As in Eter­nal Sun­shine of the Spot­less Mind, Gondry con­cen­trates on the impor­tance of indi­vid­ual moments, each one loaded with mean­ing, regard­less of its sta­tus as imag­ined or real, or in Stephane’s rare case, both at once. Stephane’s world, medi­at­ed by a peri­patet­ic stream-of-con­scious­ness, takes his ten­u­ous grasp of real­i­ty to polar extremes. His roman­tic inten­si­ty is a high stakes game that those around him dare not play, either out of fear, as in his would-be lover Stephanie’s case, or out of a con­tent­ment with or res­ig­na­tion to the mun­dane real­i­ties of the work­place and the stul­ti­fy­ing bore­dom that seems to define every­thing else.

In fact, Gondry’s stun­ning visu­al style trans­ports the ele­ment from his best known work in music videos into a full-length fea­ture to great effect. By repro­duc­ing dream log­ic both in its nar­ra­tive absur­di­ty and visu­al sur­re­al­ism, we’re able to bet­ter under­stand Stephane’s frus­tra­tion with an imper­fect world. The con­trast between dream and real­i­ty makes Stephane’s con­fu­sion all the more fan­tas­tic. More­over, it gives us a glimpse into the brit­tle bal­ance between Stephane’s com­pas­sion and nar­cis­sism inform­ing his altru­is­tic and pos­ses­sive behav­iors. Like Jared in The Eter­nal Sun­shine of the Spot­less Mind, dream log­ic and a child’s under­stand­ing of the world are often viewed as one in the same, a sort of ide­al­ized pre-con­cep­tion of real­i­ty, and an untar­nished Eden, free from intrusions.

Ulti­mate­ly, Stephane’s con­tempt for lived real­i­ty poi­sons him to those he most cher­ish­es. His dreams are fever­ish with para­noia; every off­hand remark some­how betrays him, wounds him, haunts him. It’s a damn­ing com­men­tary on the cur­rent state of affairs, and not in some over­sim­pli­fied, “Bush ‘n’ Blair hold hands in hell sense,” but one that address­es melan­choly and apa­thy from a qua­si-Sit­u­a­tion­ist per­spec­tive. By tak­ing the abstract and treat­ing as valu­able to psy­chic health as “rela­tion­ships, friend­ships and all those ships,” Gondry mash­es up Can­dide and Ras­se­las and leaves us to sort out what’s in between. All pow­er to the imag­i­na­tion indeed.