Wandering into Pan’s Labyrinth is not the same as trying to find Frankenstein’s monster, but it’s close. I’m not really sure why del Toro’s critics would compare his work to a Spanish film with superficial similarities; I’m guessing that many of them, like myself, were only recently made aware of Erice’s masterpiece thanks to the Criterion Collection, meaning that they joined anyone with a Netflix account in their ability to make this assertion. So while both are based on a little girl’s [or girls’] escapist fantasies under Franco’s reign, del Toro’s treatment avails itself of the frightening brutality of Grimm’s fairy tales, while Erice’s lingering elegy to youth has the feel of Antonioni’s existential meditations.
If a complaint should be lodged against Pan’s Labryinth, it’s that del Toro shortchanges its audience with too little fantastical allegory and too much of the cookie cutter strongman we’ve all seen before. As is pointed out in the comments on Cinemarati’s fifth best movie of the year, del Toro fails to connect the the two halves of the film in a way that meaningfully contributes to the action of the story. Too literal by half, del Toro applies the pulpy Hollywood model to a film that should rely on some dark majesty and falls short of making the crypto-political masterpiece with which he’s being credited.